This website seems to corroborate the relationship between Corojo 99 and Criollo 98:
https://www.ecured.cu/Variedades_de_tabacos
This is a valuable article. Thank you. I have labored over the formal (Google) translation, edited it, and will post the text, in English, in a separate thread.
With regard to average distances between nodes, don't count on anything definitive from that. There's just too much variation from one grow-out to the next.
When you make an intentional cross of two known tobacco strains, the first generation offspring (F[sub]1[/sub]) consists of a hodgepodge of offspring, exhibiting all sorts of combinations of the various dominant and recessive traits of the two parents. The agronomist must make choices from those gazillion F[sub]1[/sub] plants, based on appearance, demonstrated resistance to various pests, and ultimately the smoking quality. It's a multi-year process of crossing, growing, selecting, all repeated as needed.
So...if you separate two offspring, then develop them separately (which I suspect was the derivation of Criollo 98 vs. Corojo 99), they go off on different genetic tangents during the multi-year process. But yes, they are more closely related than I ever suspected. And the genetic stability of a "final" variety may still have been wobbly at the time it was commercialized.
This possibility would account for my observation that my Piloto Cubano PR produced two distinct types of plants [longer leaf vs. wider leaf] in my first grow, and that the seed from one of those types seems to have remained true to my own selection during this, my second grow of it.
Wow! This is all confounding to a humbling extent. It will be interesting to follow how your two versions of Criollo 98 turn out.
Bob