PressuredLeaf
Well-Known Member
Well some good news. I was able to dig up the authors email and sent them a note. They were very kind and connected me to a YouTube video of the ppt
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=35UwWLXOMKg
. The first half is more focused on the challenges of shifting from flue cured and burley to wrapper leaf in NC. The fertilization study starts around the 35 minute mark. If you have the time and are interested, I found it very interesting.
A few key take aways:
1. The goal was producing wrapper and binder quality leaf to maximize profitability for the farmers considering this.
2. N had the biggest impact on yield
3. K did not effect yield, but did effect leaf quality. Not as in “how does this taste or burn” but rather the mechanical qualities of the finished leaf. For example Bob mentioned some of the K “deficient” leaves cited look more like ripe leaf. I agree with Bob, but the farmer perspective was that the tip yellowing and mottling from insufficient K resulted in cured leaf that was more likely to have holes or tear, rendering it non-wrapper quality.
4. Low N tobacco molded really easily compared to the high N stuff. This one caught me off guard. I would expect larger amounts of N in the curing leaf would be beneficial for mold. In the sense that: you can’t thrive off of carbs alone, you need some protein too (bad analogy but you get the idea). Surprisingly to me, the high N leaf had almost no mold. In fact, they said you could visually walk into a barn and see which curing leaves had low N because they were so much more prone to mold.
Really interesting stuff. Again, commercial farmers probably know this pretty well, but it’s cool to bring it down to the homegrower. I’m also emailing with one of the authors to learn more about K fertilization and if they studied the stuff we care about - like combustion and sensory qualities. I’ll let everyone know what I learn.
. The first half is more focused on the challenges of shifting from flue cured and burley to wrapper leaf in NC. The fertilization study starts around the 35 minute mark. If you have the time and are interested, I found it very interesting.
A few key take aways:
1. The goal was producing wrapper and binder quality leaf to maximize profitability for the farmers considering this.
2. N had the biggest impact on yield
3. K did not effect yield, but did effect leaf quality. Not as in “how does this taste or burn” but rather the mechanical qualities of the finished leaf. For example Bob mentioned some of the K “deficient” leaves cited look more like ripe leaf. I agree with Bob, but the farmer perspective was that the tip yellowing and mottling from insufficient K resulted in cured leaf that was more likely to have holes or tear, rendering it non-wrapper quality.
4. Low N tobacco molded really easily compared to the high N stuff. This one caught me off guard. I would expect larger amounts of N in the curing leaf would be beneficial for mold. In the sense that: you can’t thrive off of carbs alone, you need some protein too (bad analogy but you get the idea). Surprisingly to me, the high N leaf had almost no mold. In fact, they said you could visually walk into a barn and see which curing leaves had low N because they were so much more prone to mold.
Really interesting stuff. Again, commercial farmers probably know this pretty well, but it’s cool to bring it down to the homegrower. I’m also emailing with one of the authors to learn more about K fertilization and if they studied the stuff we care about - like combustion and sensory qualities. I’ll let everyone know what I learn.